Trend Analysis

Market Strategy Radar Screen Weekly October 29, 2018


In this article:

  • With stock markets worldwide seeing downdrafts
  • the Glimmer Twins’ title would appear to apply

RELATED ARTICLES:

Everyday, Everyday I Have the Blues

By John Stoltzfus,
Chief Investment Strategist

Another Brick in the Wall

By John Stoltzfus,
Chief Investment Strategist



Gimme Shelter

With stock markets worldwide seeing downdrafts, the Glimmer Twins’ title would appear to apply


Key Takeaways

 

  • Stocks moved lower globally last week adding to the drama of the last five weeks.
  • Stock prices are not reflecting the 23% earnings growth reported so far in the Q3 reporting season.
  • Negative projections pertaining to the US-China trade skirmish and Fed monetary policy have heavily influenced the direction of stock prices so far in October.
  • Economic data continues to evidence some slowing in economic growth but not a recession ahead.

 

With just three trading days left in the month, October 2018 has given investors a “month to remember” (for at least for as long as institutional memory can persevere).

 

October has provided plenty of drama this year. However, In future hindsight, in our view it could prove to be the best buying opportunity investors have had in some time.

 

Valuations haven’t been this good in years (see page 4 of this report for details). Consider that the S&P 500 as of last week sported a forward P/E multiple of just over 15X earnings.

 

With some 240 of the S&P 500’s member companies having thus far reported, Q3 earnings results appear resplendent with earnings growth up over 23% on the back of revenue growth near 9%. It’s the forward guidance—when some company managements look at what might lie ahead tied to the trade/tariff skirmish with China—that has produced concerns among the analytical community. A key problem is that projections of the outcome to a trade war tend toward the darker side of things.

 

Businesses in the US and China are not shy about expressing their concerns about the risks to revenues and earnings should the trade war become protracted. Notwithstanding the considerable amount of rhetoric produced by both sides, the voices of powerful constituencies comprised of business owners, managers, labor and consumers of both countries are likely to be felt by the two countries’ respective leaders whether their power is derived by mandate “for life” or provided by national election.

 

Negative projections by bearish market participants and a market tantrum to rival the most spoilt child’s outcry shouldn’t deter investors from staying the course and riding out what has been thus far (and may continue for at least a few more days—or weeks) a perfect storm based not so much on fundamentals but on market “technicals,” impatient leveraged players’ distress and what seems to be market bears’ determination to get even with a bull market that has shown significant resilience and recovery capabilities for longer than most ever expected.

 


“While October has thus far provided plenty of drama and angst for investors, what has come to pass may well in hindsight prove to have been the best buying opportunity for investors’ consideration in some time.”

 

We believe that cooler heads are likely to prevail as they have in the recent past (i.e. in 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009) whenever the market got cranky about nearterm news and too negatively projected the future.

 

Fasten Those Seatbelts…

 

We’re hearing other commentators begin to suggest what we have long recommended—build shopping lists, stay diversified, look for babies that have gotten thrown out with the bathwater and remember that around 99.9% of the time when the pilot on a commercial flight reminds passengers to keep their seat belts fastened because there’s turbulence ahead—it doesn’t mean the plane is about to crash.

 

Any downside move that is dramatically (even breathlessly) commented on by market observers tends to feed the flames of a pullback and cause those prone to panic attacks to extrapolate negatively into the future. “Consider the source” is advice that we have come to practice at times like these.

 

Multinationals are showing some strain and forward concerns about the effects of a strong dollar and the impact of tariff regimens that are already increasing their costs and weighing on stock prices. In most cases reported so far as we can see the effects of the trade dispute appear manageable if not without causing inconvenience and cost to companies affected.

 

We’d also consider that while US multinationals are feeling discomfort as the trade/tariff dispute ramps up, their foreign counterparts (particularly in China) are likely experiencing or about to experience even greater pain should the tariff fracas become protracted.

 

Consider that for many US companies the disruption and cost will come from efforts to find new sources to replace Chinese supply and production lines. The problem for China is likely to be two-fold as there are countries likely all too eager to take China’s place in the global supply chain in developing, emerging and frontier markets. China for all its potential— realized and future—is simply “not the only crayon in the box.”

 

For China’s multinational corporations the challenge coming from a trade war with the US appears to be substantially greater as they will need to replace what has become their best customer base in the world (the US consumer) with China’s domestic consumers, who have on average much lower disposable and per capita incomes compared to their US counterparts. Other alternative consumers for China’s products elsewhere in the world may already be customers and are not likely to be a source for additional demand for China’s products.

 

Why can’t we be friends…?

 

The impractical nature of a trade war has raised the hackles in the barnyard. No longer “a standoff at the OK Corral” but now an engagement of hostilities with global economic consequence, the cost of one party losing face has got to be taken into consideration to arrive at a suitable resolution of the tariff conflict.

 

Until then the markets could stay prone to acting out their fears on a day to day basis or at least until a cathartic moment occurs when capitulation becomes evident and sellers are exhausted.

 

The good news is we might be close to that moment of market capitulation (if it hasn’t come already) as the fundamentals both economic and corporate indicate to us that the distress the markets have been reflecting is more about some point in the future that may not come to pass and less about the fundamentals.

 

About Those Earnings…

 

We’d say the distress the market has shown through much of the worst selling has run counter to what is revealed by economic and corporate data points.

 

Consider Q3 earnings season which thus far is proving to be in actuality not a disappointment but rather another quarter of results beating consensus analyst expectations.

 

The third-quarter earnings season for the S&P 500 doesn’t look to us as much as a “swan song” for revenue and earnings growth, but rather as a resilient if not resplendent earnings season disregarded by negative extrapolation around the potential of a protracted (lengthy) trade war with China, compounded by overblown fears about the potential for the US Federal Reserve policy mistake.

 

Ironically, so far the Fed has shown over the past nearly ten years a sensitivity both for strengths as well as vulnerabilities within the US economy that has contributed not only an economic recovery from the depths of the worst financial crisis since the 1930s, but an economic expansion that has delivered sustainable growth and appears to have the potential to improve from here.

 

The Trade War Isn’t Bloody

 

Though there’s been some discussion on corporate earnings calls this season showing concerns about the effects of a strong dollar on US multinationals’ global competiveness as well as about trade war costs (and whether they are passed on to consumers or absorbed) the trade war has yet to become a protracted mechanism resulting in systemic damage.

 

While October 2018 has thus far provided plenty of drama and angst for investors, what has come to pass may well in hindsight prove to have been the best buying opportunity for investors’ consideration in some time.

 

Isn’t it a Pity?

 

We can’t help but think that it’s a pity that when stocks go “on sale” as they have in recent weeks that too many investors haven’t been able to make it to the “store” and jam the doors trying to get in to buy quality items that appear to us to have been drastically reduced in price.

 

We’re reminded that it’s the classic reaction of so many market participants to opt for a “deer in the headlamps” or a “run for the hills” mode when stocks are falling.

 

Our investment mantra in these weeks besieged by market sentiment full of “trial and trepidation” continues to be “know what you own, why you own it (relative to your goals and objectives) and have reasonable expectations as to how it will perform in varied investment scenarios.”

 

At times like this we say it’s important for investors to right size their expectations for the near term, build shopping lists of sensible stocks that they may have found too pricey to spring for just a few weeks ago and seek out “babies that get thrown out with the bath water” while others are busy overreacting to the drama du jour. Carpe diem.

 

 

 

 

 

For the complete report, please contact your Oppenheimer Financial Advisor.


Other Disclosures

This report is issued and approved by Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., a member of all Principal Exchanges, and SIPC. This report is distributed by Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., for informational purposes only, to its institutional and retail investor clients. This report does not constitute an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities discussed herein in any jurisdiction where such offer or solicitation would be prohibited. The securities mentioned in this report may not be suitable for all types of investors. This report does not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation or specific needs of any particular client of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. Recipients should consider this report as only a single factor in making an investment decision and should not rely solely on investment recommendations contained herein, if any, as a substitution for the exercise of independent judgment of the merits and risks of investments. The strategist writing this report is not a person or company with actual, implied or apparent authority to act on behalf of any issuer mentioned in the report. Before making an investment decision with respect to any security discussed in this report, the recipient should consider whether such investment is appropriate given the recipient's particular investment needs, objectives and financial circumstances. We recommend that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourage investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. will not treat non-client recipients as its clients solely by virtue of their receiving this report. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results, and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made regarding future performance of any security mentioned in this report. The price of the securities mentioned in this report and the income they produce may fluctuate and/or be adversely affected by exchange rates, and investors may realize losses on investments in such securities, including the loss of investment principal.

 

Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. accepts no liability for any loss arising from the use of information contained in this report. All information, opinions and statistical data contained in this report were obtained or derived from public sources believed to be reliable, but Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. does not represent that any such information, opinion or statistical data is accurate or complete and they should not be relied upon as such. All estimates and opinions expressed herein constitute judgments as of the date of this report and are subject to change without notice. Nothing in this report constitutes legal, accounting or tax advice. Since the levels and bases of taxation can change, any reference in this report to the impact of taxation

 

INVESTMENT STRATEGY

should not be construed as offering tax advice on the tax consequences of investments. As with any investment having potential tax implications, clients should consult with their own independent tax adviser.

 

This report may provide addresses of, or contain hyperlinks to, Internet web sites. Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. has not reviewed the linked Internet web site of any third party and takes no responsibility for the contents thereof. Each such address or hyperlink is provided solely for the recipient's convenience and information, and the content of linked third party web sites is not in any way incorporated into this document. Recipients who choose to access such third-party web sites or follow such hyperlinks do so at their own risk. The S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged value-weighted index of 500 common stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The S&P 500 index figures do not reflect any fees, expenses or taxes. This research is distributed in the UK and elsewhere throughout Europe, as third party research by Oppenheimer Europe Ltd, which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). This research is for information purposes only and is not to be construed as a solicitation or an offer to purchase or sell investments or related financial instruments. This report is for distribution only to persons who are eligible counterparties or professional clients and is exempt from the general restrictions in section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 on the communication of invitations or inducements to engage in investment activity on the grounds that it is being distributed in the UK only to persons of a kind described in Article 19(5) (Investment Professionals) and 49(2) High Net Worth companies, unincorporated associations etc.) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (as amended). It is not intended to be distributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other class of persons. In particular, this material is not for distribution to, and should not be relied upon by, retail clients, as defined under the rules of the FCA. Neither the FCA’s protection rules nor compensation scheme may be applied. This report or any portion hereof may not be reprinted, sold, or redistributed without the written consent of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. Copyright © Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. 2015.


About John Stoltzfus

John is one of the most popular faces around Oppenheimer: our clients have come to rely on his market recaps for timely analysis and a confident viewpoint on the road forward. He frequently lends his expertise to CNBC, Bloomberg, Fox Business channel and other notable networks.

Full Profile