Trend Analysis

Market Strategy Radar Screen Weekly October 22, 2018


In this article:

  • As we quote Bob Dylan
  • we think “and that ain’t such a bad thing”

RELATED ARTICLES:

Everyday, Everyday I Have the Blues

By John Stoltzfus,
Chief Investment Strategist

Another Brick in the Wall

By John Stoltzfus,
Chief Investment Strategist



The Times They Are a-Changin’

As we quote Bob Dylan, we think “and that ain’t such a bad thing”


Key Takeaways

 

  • Transitions occurring in interest rates and in the way trade is conducted globally are causing investor sentiment to become unsettled.
  • We suggest that while transitions can be disruptive, the changes that result can often lead to progress.
  • With the midterm elections looming in the US, the next opportunity for China and the US to make strides toward a resolution to the trade fracas comes at the G20 Meeting in Buenos Aires.
  • Recent economic data signals that the US economy may be slowing but not that recession is imminent.

 

Markets and investors are currently bearing the burden of transitions taking place around the world as currencies fluctuate, stocks bounce between gains and losses (depending on the sentiment du jour) and interest rates point higher, even if hinting at a lack of conviction as bond traders play the game of price discovery.

 

It’s not quite a “gird thy loins moment,” but it requires patience and perhaps a level of confidence and conviction that investors have not had to call on for some time (recall 2017 when market volatility was at historical lows?).

 

The old saying is that “markets don’t like uncertainty.” Another is that "people don’t like change”—and in fact resist it.

 

The good news we believe is that historically from uncertainty usually comes not only risk but also significant opportunity as progress emerges from the process of change— particularly when it’s a change for the better.

 

From our perch on the Market Strategy Radar Screen, we expect that issues surrounding the trade war between the US and China will be with us at least through the US mid-term elections. It’s generally recognized that China’s leadership has shown a reluctance to give the Trump administration a deal that might help the president’s favored candidates garner winning votes on November 8.

 

The period after the election will likely offer the next opportunity for China to come back to the table and negotiate a deal with the US.

 

In the meantime, China’s economy continues to show signs that growth is slowing: Bloomberg shows the country’s GDP grew 6.5% in Q3 from a year earlier. China’s monetary policy makers are having delicately to balance between providing liquidity to the system while trying to avoid allowing a degree of accommodation that could place the economy in jeopardy of a financial crisis, led by the indebtedness of many of China’s state-run enterprises and local municipalities as well as real estate investments that have run too hot for too long.

 

 


“There appears to us too much to lose for all sides involved for the trade war to go on indefinitely. The wrath of trade wars historically spares no one but rather ravages all involved.”

 

With the effects of the tariff war already being felt to some extent by China’s manufacturers and exporters, we believe there’s an incentive for China to return to the bargaining table and strike a deal with the US.

 

For the US, the sooner a trade deal can be arrived at with China, the more likely that further damage to the US economy (particularly the agricultural sector) can be averted.

 

Just a little over three months ago (in July), the second tranche of tariffs was launched by the US with China retaliating shortly thereafter. Several more volleys have been levied by both nations since then as trade hostilities have heated up further.

 

There appears to us too much to lose for all sides involved for the trade war to go on indefinitely. The wrath of trade wars historically spares no one but rather ravages all involved.

 

Businesses in the US and in China are eager to get beyond the trade skirmishes and move toward resolution to the tariffs thus far imposed before these burdens disrupt what had been up to the start of the trade wars a global economic recovery, led by what had become a sustainable economic recovery in the US.

 

China has its goals and objectives for the “Made in China 2025” plan that could be significantly delayed by a protracted trade war.

 

US Businesses Also Fret About the Uncertainty

 

For the US, further progress of its economic expansion could be disrupted as businesses delay making investments in an environment in which tariffs threaten the highly complex supply chains and production systems.

 

Ironically, the US efforts to bring existing and recent trade agreements up to date and in line with a world in which globalization and technology have become deeply embedded are instead raising hurdles that threaten to disrupt a world economic recovery that was hard-earned by central banks.

 

Experience dealing with parallel challenges to economic growth derived from geopolitical roots in the past tells us that so long as leaders meet and talk, there’s a good chance for resolution.

 

Trump and Xi Expected Meet at the End of November

 

The G20’s meeting in Buenos Aires scheduled for late November offers the next best opportunity for the US and China to meet “mano a mano” (president to president) and hopefully find a workable resolution to what has become a regrettable standoff.

 

Until some progress is made at such a geopolitical level, markets are likely to remain under an overhang of uncertainty that will result in periods of market volatility in the months ahead.

 

Doubting the Fed

 

Aside from trade wars, the other principal concern du jour moving markets of late has been that the Federal Reserve will make a mistake in either raising rates too fast or too high (causing the economy to slip into a recession) or too slowly and too late—thereby feeding inflation.

 

Based on the Fed’s performance since the fall of 2008 (through two prior and now the current Fed chairs), a Fed mistake does not seem imminent, in our view. The central bank has thus far shown remarkable sensitivity to both strengths as well as vulnerabilities in the economy in implementing a process of interest rate normalization.

 

The ability of the Fed to have thus far avoided making a significant mistake in its efforts to nurture an economic expansion from the ashes of the financial crisis, we believe, has to do with its improved capability to gather data as well as to crunch numbers as a result of improvements in technology.

 

As we have mentioned in prior issues of the MSRS Weekly, the Fed in the current rate hike cycle has raised only eight times in under three years compared to 17 times in the last cycle (from the end of June 2004 to the end of June 2006). All these moves have been in increments of 25 basis points.

 

In the current hike cycle, the Fed has raised its benchmark rate from a band of 0% to 0.25% on December 16, 2015, to a band of 2.00% to 2.25% when the FOMC met on September 26th of this year. In the last cycle, the Fed raised rates from 1% to 5.25% over the 24-month period.

 

It’s not surprising to us that as the benchmark rate has risen, market rates have begun to adjust upward as well (albeit to levels far from historically high), causing mortgage applications to slow, auto sales to have tapered and some businesses (particularly those relying on high levels of borrowing) to begin to feel the pinch of higher rates.

 

Those who have experienced previous hike cycles will recall that some slowing in lending is not uncommon, particularly as borrowers consider the relative higher cost of money to what they recall in recent memory was a lower cost “only a short time ago.” This reaction is likely to be especially felt at first in an environment where interest rates have been abnormally low or what has been a period of nearly “free money” for much of the past ten years.

 

In an environment like the one we are currently experiencing, investors should find that practicing patience and seeking opportunities that present themselves to be good discipline.

 

 

 

 

For the complete report, please contact your Oppenheimer Financial Advisor.


Other Disclosures

This report is issued and approved by Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., a member of all Principal Exchanges, and SIPC. This report is distributed by Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., for informational purposes only, to its institutional and retail investor clients. This report does not constitute an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities discussed herein in any jurisdiction where such offer or solicitation would be prohibited. The securities mentioned in this report may not be suitable for all types of investors. This report does not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation or specific needs of any particular client of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. Recipients should consider this report as only a single factor in making an investment decision and should not rely solely on investment recommendations contained herein, if any, as a substitution for the exercise of independent judgment of the merits and risks of investments. The strategist writing this report is not a person or company with actual, implied or apparent authority to act on behalf of any issuer mentioned in the report. Before making an investment decision with respect to any security discussed in this report, the recipient should consider whether such investment is appropriate given the recipient's particular investment needs, objectives and financial circumstances. We recommend that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourage investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. will not treat non-client recipients as its clients solely by virtue of their receiving this report. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results, and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made regarding future performance of any security mentioned in this report. The price of the securities mentioned in this report and the income they produce may fluctuate and/or be adversely affected by exchange rates, and investors may realize losses on investments in such securities, including the loss of investment principal.

 

Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. accepts no liability for any loss arising from the use of information contained in this report. All information, opinions and statistical data contained in this report were obtained or derived from public sources believed to be reliable, but Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. does not represent that any such information, opinion or statistical data is accurate or complete and they should not be relied upon as such. All estimates and opinions expressed herein constitute judgments as of the date of this report and are subject to change without notice. Nothing in this report constitutes legal, accounting or tax advice. Since the levels and bases of taxation can change, any reference in this report to the impact of taxation

 

INVESTMENT STRATEGY

should not be construed as offering tax advice on the tax consequences of investments. As with any investment having potential tax implications, clients should consult with their own independent tax adviser.

 

This report may provide addresses of, or contain hyperlinks to, Internet web sites. Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. has not reviewed the linked Internet web site of any third party and takes no responsibility for the contents thereof. Each such address or hyperlink is provided solely for the recipient's convenience and information, and the content of linked third party web sites is not in any way incorporated into this document. Recipients who choose to access such third-party web sites or follow such hyperlinks do so at their own risk. The S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged value-weighted index of 500 common stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The S&P 500 index figures do not reflect any fees, expenses or taxes. This research is distributed in the UK and elsewhere throughout Europe, as third party research by Oppenheimer Europe Ltd, which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). This research is for information purposes only and is not to be construed as a solicitation or an offer to purchase or sell investments or related financial instruments. This report is for distribution only to persons who are eligible counterparties or professional clients and is exempt from the general restrictions in section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 on the communication of invitations or inducements to engage in investment activity on the grounds that it is being distributed in the UK only to persons of a kind described in Article 19(5) (Investment Professionals) and 49(2) High Net Worth companies, unincorporated associations etc.) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (as amended). It is not intended to be distributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other class of persons. In particular, this material is not for distribution to, and should not be relied upon by, retail clients, as defined under the rules of the FCA. Neither the FCA’s protection rules nor compensation scheme may be applied. This report or any portion hereof may not be reprinted, sold, or redistributed without the written consent of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. Copyright © Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. 2015.


About John Stoltzfus

John is one of the most popular faces around Oppenheimer: our clients have come to rely on his market recaps for timely analysis and a confident viewpoint on the road forward. He frequently lends his expertise to CNBC, Bloomberg, Fox Business channel and other notable networks.

Full Profile